Subject	hm. no. (n/m)
Posted by	PennStateZ on November 16, 2005 at 12:01 PM
	This message has been viewed 15 times.
In Reply To	The problem IS they are FALKENS, posted by Tektrader69 on November 16, 2005 at 08:19 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Did NE1 have a bad experience with Falken ST-115 like this>> - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 22:16:52 11/15/05 WOW...I was considering the FK-451s... - BradZ (FL) 22:27:27 11/15/05 To clarify, it's a problem with the ST-115, NOT the FK-451. - whitepearlz 23:01:59 11/15/05 falkens are cheap tires, but that has got to be a - Zrevolver 23:15:26 11/15/05 That guy would be better served by contacting Falken direct - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:20:33 11/15/05 Hankook's all the way. Check the Car and Driver Tire Test... - Chase86 23:46:53 11/15/05 Yup ST-115 are garbage... - JC (Vegas) 00:18:59 11/16/05 RT-615 (n/m) - Snoguitar 00:52:24 11/16/05 RT-215 too. Thanks for the correction. (n/m) - JC (Vegas) 01:34:42 11/16/05 I am going to try the New rT-615 - Carlos Ramirez 07:39:35 11/16/05 The problem IS they are FALKENS, - Tektrader69 08:19:13 11/16/05 hm. no. (n/m) - PennStateZ 12:01:11 11/16/05 Hmm YES - Tektrader69 00:10:28 11/17/05 That's the opposite of my experience with 451's. - PennStateZ 09:39:47 11/17/05 wtf! (n/m) - 300zdett(nj) 09:01:44 11/16/05 The 451's handle alright, but have a SHORT life. (n/m) - Alex'sVG30DETT (SoFL) 09:23:58 11/16/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.